What do you think the people who support or led the creation of these laws* think are the positive outcomes they are aiming for with them?
I think the imagined outcome is achieving more space for right wing ideology in higher education, purportedly to achieve more balance.  I think they are trying to live up to a Christian / biblical moral imperative. For some people it's not principled, the positive outcome is staying in power.
Back
Sorry, this website is only available on desktop
Discover the deeper purpose behind FLOAT and why it stands as a beacon for artists navigating turbulent times.